Top Oncology EHR Vendors: A Comparison

Q: What is the difference between a general EHR and an oncology EHR?

A general EHR covers broad medical documentation, while an oncology EHR is built for cancer care. It includes chemotherapy protocols, infusion scheduling, oncology-specific decision support, and cancer registry reporting that general systems typically lack.

Q: Which oncology EHR vendors are best for small practices?

Cloud-based systems such as Flatiron OncoEMR, CureMD, and AdvancedMD often fit smaller oncology practices thanks to simpler setup, lower upfront costs, and streamlined workflows.

Q: What factors should oncology practices consider before choosing an EHR vendor?

Evaluate interoperability with hospital systems (e.g., Epic, Cerner), compliance with HIPAA and ONC, support for FHIR/HL7 standards, patient engagement features (telehealth and portals), scalability for practice size, and total cost of ownership including implementation and training.

EHR/EMR

TL;DR

Oncology EHR vendors provide specialized features for chemotherapy regimens, infusion orders, and cancer registry reporting.
Leading solutions include Epic Beacon, Cerner PowerChart Oncology, Flatiron Health’s OncoEMR, Elekta MOSAIQ, and Varian Aria.
Key considerations when choosing oncology EHR software: interoperability, scalability, patient engagement, and billing integration.
Practices should strike a balance between cost and functionality to match their size and specialty needs.

An oncology EHR is a type of electronic health record software specifically designed for cancer care. Unlike general EHRs, it includes tools for chemotherapy ordering, infusion scheduling, radiation workflows, and oncology billing services. The goal is to help oncologists manage complex treatments while staying compliant with reporting standards.

Oncology practices face challenges that general EHRs cannot always handle. Providers must track multiple cycles of chemotherapy, manage toxicity monitoring, integrate genomic test results, and support clinical trials. Specialized oncology EHR software streamlines these workflows, reducing errors and improving care coordination across multidisciplinary teams.

I. What Makes Oncology EHR Vendors Different?

Oncology EHR vendors are not simply offering general-purpose systems. They provide software built to meet the clinical and administrative complexities of cancer care. Below are the core areas that set oncology EHR software apart from traditional EHRs.

A. Handling Chemotherapy Protocols and Infusion Orders

Oncology EHRs allow providers to create and manage chemotherapy regimens with built-in safety checks.
Infusion order templates help reduce errors by standardizing drug doses and administration schedules, thereby enhancing patient safety.
Real-time alerts ensure clinicians are notified about drug interactions, lab abnormalities, or dosage concerns.

B. Oncology-Specific Templates and Decision Support

Oncology EHR vendors offer disease-specific documentation templates for conditions such as breast cancer, lung cancer, and hematology.
Built-in decision support tools guide oncologists with evidence-based treatment recommendations.
Structured templates help standardize charting, thereby improving the collection of clinical research data.

C. Integration with Lab, Imaging, and Genomic Data

Oncology EHR software is designed to integrate pathology reports, imaging scans, and molecular testing data into a single record.
Seamless connections with radiology and lab systems reduce delays in diagnosis and treatment planning.
Genomic data integration supports precision medicine by linking genetic profiles with targeted therapy options.

D. Compliance with HIPAA, ONC, and Cancer Registry Reporting

Oncology EHR vendors must ensure compliance with HIPAA privacy and security requirements to protect sensitive patient information.
ONC-certified systems meet federal standards for interoperability and reporting.
Many oncology EHR systems include built-in tools for cancer registry submissions, enabling practices to meet state and national reporting obligations without additional manual work.

Looking to Build Your Own Custom Integrated EHR?

Let's Talk!

II. Key Factors to Consider When Choosing Oncology EHR Vendors

Selecting the right oncology EHR software requires more than looking at features. Practices need to evaluate how well the system will support their size, specialty focus, and long-term growth. Below are the critical factors to consider when reviewing oncology EHR vendors.

A. Interoperability with Epic, Cerner, Athenahealth, and Others

Oncology practices often operate within networks that also provide care in larger hospital systems.
Interoperability ensures that data flows smoothly between systems, such as Epic EHR, Cerner EHR, and Athenahealth EHR.
Without this capability, practices risk duplication of tests, incomplete patient histories, and slower care coordination.

B. Support for FHIR and HL7 Integration

Oncology EHR vendors should support modern standards, such as FHIR and HL7, to facilitate the exchange of data across labs, pharmacies, and registries.
These integrations reduce manual data entry, which is critical when managing complex oncology workflows.
Support for structured data exchange also prepares practices for value-based care models that require robust reporting.

C. Patient Engagement Features (Telehealth and Portals)

Oncology patients often need ongoing monitoring and frequent communication between visits.
Telehealth integration enables oncologists to review symptoms, adjust medications, and provide counseling without the need for in-person visits.
Patient portals give patients access to their treatment plans, lab results, and secure messaging, which can improve adherence and reduce anxiety.

D. Scalability for Small vs. Large Oncology Practices

Small oncology clinics may prioritize ease of use and affordable pricing, while large cancer centers may require complex workflows and integrations.
Vendors should offer flexible deployment models, whether cloud-based for smaller practices or enterprise-scale systems for hospitals.
Scalability ensures that the EHR software continues to perform well as patient volume increases or as new services such as radiation oncology are added.

E. Cost and Implementation Timeline

Oncology EHR software varies widely in price, from subscription-based cloud platforms to enterprise licenses.
Implementation timelines can range from weeks to over a year, depending on the size of the practice and the complexity of the system.
Practices should evaluate not only upfront costs but also long-term expenses such as maintenance, training, and oncology-specific billing services.

III. Top Oncology EHR Vendors

The oncology EHR market includes both enterprise platforms and specialty-focused solutions. Each vendor brings distinct advantages and trade-offs. Below is a detailed comparison of the top oncology EHR vendors.

1. Epic Beacon (Epic Systems)

Oncology-focused Epic module: Epic Beacon is designed for large hospitals and cancer centers already running Epic EHR. It supports chemotherapy order management, infusion workflows, and precision medicine integration.
Strengths

Seamless integration with the full Epic ecosystem, including lab, pharmacy, and patient portals.
Strong decision support for drug interactions and regimen safety.
Widely adopted in academic medical centers, making it a proven choice for enterprise networks.

Weaknesses

High implementation cost makes it less feasible for smaller practices.
Complexity requires extensive training and ongoing IT support.

2. Cerner PowerChart Oncology

Designed for oncology workflows: Cerner PowerChart Oncology supports infusion scheduling, treatment planning, and cancer registry submissions.
Strengths

Built-in cancer registry reporting tools that simplify compliance.
Strong infusion management workflows, including safety alerts and dose adjustments.
Integration with Cerner Millennium for lab and radiology.

Weaknesses

Requires significant training for staff to adapt to oncology-specific functions.
Smaller practices may find the platform too resource-intensive.

3. Flatiron Health (OncoEMR)

Cloud-based, oncology-specific: Flatiron’s OncoEMR is a dedicated oncology EHR widely used by independent practices and research groups.
Strengths

Strong focus on research with real-world evidence data integration.
Intuitive user interface designed specifically for oncologists.
Cloud deployment reduces IT infrastructure burden.

Weaknesses

A narrow focus makes it less suitable for multi-specialty practices.
Limited interoperability compared with enterprise EHRs like Epic or Cerner.

4. Elekta MOSAIQ

Radiation oncology and medical oncology: Elekta MOSAIQ supports both medical and radiation oncology with integrated imaging and treatment planning.
Strengths

Comprehensive tools for radiation therapy planning and delivery.
Ability to connect with imaging devices and treatment machines.
Centralized patient record across oncology disciplines.

Weaknesses

The user interface is often considered less intuitive compared to competitors.
Customization can require significant technical expertise.

5. Varian Aria Oncology Information System

Comprehensive oncology care management: Varian Aria is known for strong integration with radiation equipment and multidisciplinary care coordination.
Strengths

Device-level integration with Varian radiation therapy machines.
End-to-end oncology workflows from medical to radiation oncology.
Flexible reporting tools that support clinical research and compliance.

Weaknesses

Higher implementation effort compared to cloud-based options.
Best suited for hospital networks with significant oncology service lines.

6. Other Notable Oncology EHR Vendors

MEDITECH Oncology: Offers integrated oncology documentation and treatment workflows within the MEDITECH EHR environment.
CureMD Oncology Module: Cloud-based oncology-specific EHR designed for small to medium practices.
AdvancedMD for Oncology Practices: Provides oncology templates, billing, and telehealth integration with an emphasis on cost-efficiency.

IV. How to Choose the Right Oncology EHR Vendor

Selecting the right oncology EHR software requires balancing clinical needs, compliance, and financial considerations. Below are key steps to guide practices in making the best decision.

A. Assess Practice Size and Oncology Specialty

Small oncology clinics may prioritize ease of use and low upfront costs.
Large hospitals or cancer centers require robust, multi-specialty support, advanced analytics, and seamless research integration.
Practices offering both medical and radiation oncology services should select vendors with robust imaging and device connectivity capabilities.

B. Prioritize Interoperability and Compliance

Ensure the EHR vendor supports interoperability with Epic, Cerner, Athenahealth, and labs.
Confirm compliance with HIPAA and ONC standards for secure patient data exchange.
Look for built-in cancer registry reporting to simplify submissions and reduce manual effort.

C. Balance Cost vs. Functionality

Subscription-based oncology EHR software like Flatiron OncoEMR offers flexibility for smaller practices.
Enterprise solutions such as Epic Beacon or Cerner PowerChart come with higher costs but deliver deep integration across networks.
The budget should also account for training, IT support, and ongoing updates.

D. Consider Patient Engagement and Reporting Needs

Oncology patients need frequent communication, making portals and telehealth features essential.
Automated reminders for infusion appointments and lab tests reduce no-shows and improve adherence.
Reporting tools for outcomes and billing enable practices to monitor their financial performance and improve reimbursement accuracy.

Ready to Build an EHR From Scratch?

Book a Call with Us

V. Mindbowser’s Role in Oncology EHR Integration

Choosing the right oncology EHR vendor is only the first step. Ensuring smooth integration, compliance, and long-term usability is where many practices face challenges. This is where Mindbowser helps oncology providers bridge the gap between technology and care delivery.

A. Experience with Epic, Cerner, and Athenahealth Interoperability

Mindbowser has worked with major EHR systems, including Epic, Cerner, and Athenahealth.
Our teams understand how oncology-specific workflows interact with enterprise systems.
This expertise reduces delays during integration, ensuring oncology providers can focus on patient care.

B. HealthConnect CoPilot Workflow for FHIR, HL7, and Wearable Integration

HealthConnect CoPilot streamlines connectivity across 20+ EHR systems, leveraging FHIR, HL7, and CCDA standards.
Oncology practices can integrate genomic data, lab results, and imaging directly into their workflows.
HealthConnect CoPilot also supports wearable data, enabling oncologists to track patient vitals and treatment side effects in real time.

C. Proven Success in EHR Compliance and Oncology-Specific Solutions

Mindbowser applies a compliance-first approach, covering HIPAA, SOC 2, and ONC requirements.
Our case studies include oncology-focused platforms that improved workflow efficiency and billing accuracy.
We help practices implement oncology EHR software with integrated billing services, reducing claim denials and increasing revenue predictability.

Conclusion

Oncology EHR vendors offer specialized tools that enable cancer care teams to manage complex treatments, ensure compliance, and achieve better patient outcomes. From Epic Beacon and Cerner PowerChart to Flatiron OncoEMR, Elekta MOSAIQ, and Varian Aria, each vendor brings strengths and trade-offs.

The key takeaway is simple: practices should select oncology EHR software based on their size, specialty, and integration needs. Small clinics may find value in cloud-based systems with lower costs, while large cancer centers benefit from enterprise platforms with deep interoperability.

Mindbowser helps providers go beyond vendor selection by ensuring smooth integration, compliance, and scalability. With proven expertise in oncology EHR implementation and billing workflows, we support practices in building systems that improve care and financial performance.

Talk to our experts!

What is the difference between a general EHR and an oncology EHR?

A general EHR covers broad medical documentation, while oncology EHR software is designed for cancer care. It includes chemotherapy protocols, infusion scheduling, and cancer registry reporting, which are often lacking in general systems.

Which oncology EHR vendors are best for small practices?

Cloud-based systems, such as Flatiron OncoEMR, CureMD, and AdvancedMD, are better suited for smaller oncology practices due to their more straightforward setup, lower upfront costs, and simpler workflows.

How do oncology EHRs improve billing services?

Oncology EHRs support accurate coding for chemotherapy, infusion therapy, and complex oncology treatments. Built-in billing workflows reduce claim denials and ensure compliance with payer rules.

What factors should oncology practices consider before choosing an EHR vendor?

Key factors include interoperability with existing hospital systems, compliance with HIPAA and ONC, support for FHIR/HL7 standards, patient engagement features, scalability, and total cost of ownership.

Pravin Uttarwar

CTO, Mindbowser

Pravin is an MIT alumnus and healthcare tech leader with 16+ years of expertise in crafting FHIR-compliant systems, AI-driven platforms, and EHR integrations. A serial entrepreneur and community builder, Pravin has spearheaded the development of 100+ healthcare products, transforming patient care and operational efficiency. Passionate about scaling remote tech teams and advancing healthcare innovation, he envisions a future where technology revolutionizes care delivery and empowers the healthcare ecosystem.

Let's create something together!

We worked with Mindbowser on a design sprint, and their team did an awesome job. They really helped us shape the look and feel of our web app and gave us a clean, thoughtful design that our build team could...

Scriptyak Founder

The team at Mindbowser was highly professional, patient, and collaborative throughout our engagement. They struck the right balance between offering guidance and taking direction, which made the development process smooth. Although our project wasn’t related to healthcare, we clearly benefited...

Dan Barnes

Founder, Texas Ranch Security

Mindbowser played a crucial role in helping us bring everything together into a unified, cohesive product. Their commitment to industry-standard coding practices made an enormous difference, allowing developers to seamlessly transition in and out of the project without any confusion....

David Hoffman

CEO, MarketsAI

I'm thrilled to be partnering with Mindbowser on our journey with TravelRite. The collaboration has been exceptional, and I’m truly grateful for the dedication and expertise the team has brought to the development process. Their commitment to our mission is...

Marc Ott

Founder & CEO, TravelRite

The Mindbowser team's professionalism consistently impressed me. Their commitment to quality shone through in every aspect of the project. They truly went the extra mile, ensuring they understood our needs perfectly and were always willing to invest the time to...

Spencer Barns

CTO, New Day Therapeutics

I collaborated with Mindbowser for several years on a complex SaaS platform project. They took over a partially completed project and successfully transformed it into a fully functional and robust platform. Throughout the entire process, the quality of their work...

David Rhodes

President, E.B. Carlson

Mindbowser and team are professional, talented and very responsive. They got us through a challenging situation with our IOT product successfully. They will be our go to dev team going forward.

Dan Munro

Founder, Cascada

Amazing team to work with. Very responsive and very skilled in both front and backend engineering. Looking forward to our next project together.

Anthony Lewis

Co-Founder, Emerge

The team is great to work with. Very professional, on task, and efficient.

Matthew Holsclaw

Founder, PeriopMD

I can not express enough how pleased we are with the whole team. From the first call and meeting, they took our vision and ran with it. Communication was easy and everyone was flexible to our schedule. I’m excited to...

Angela Boudreaux

Founder, Seeke

We had very close go live timeline and Mindbowser team got us live a month before.

Shaz Khan

CEO, BuyNow WorldWide

Mindbowser brought in a team of skilled developers who were easy to work with and deeply committed to the project. If you're looking for reliable, high-quality development support, I’d absolutely recommend them.

Vladimir Kudryavtsev

Founder, Teach Reach

Mindbowser built both iOS and Android apps for Mindworks, that have stood the test of time. 5 years later they still function quite beautifully. Their team always met their objectives and I'm very happy with the end result. Thank you!

Bart Mendel

Founder, Mindworks

Mindbowser has delivered a much better quality product than our previous tech vendors. Our product is stable and passed Well Architected Framework Review from AWS.

Pankaj Parashar

CEO, PurpleAnt

I am happy to share that we got USD 10k in cloud credits courtesy of our friends at Mindbowser. Thank you Pravin and Ayush, this means a lot to us.

Sudheer Bandaru

CTO, Shortlist

Mindbowser is one of the reasons that our app is successful. These guys have been a great team.

Dave Dubier

Founder & CEO, MangoMirror

Kudos for all your hard work and diligence on the Telehealth platform project. You made it possible.

Joyce Nwatuobi

CEO, ThriveHealth

Mindbowser helped us build an awesome iOS app to bring balance to people’s lives.

Addie Wootten

CEO, SMILINGMIND

They were a very responsive team! Extremely easy to communicate and work with!

Kristen M.

Founder & CEO, TotTech

We’ve had very little-to-no hiccups at all—it’s been a really pleasurable experience.

Chacko Thomas

Co-Founder, TEAM8s

Mindbowser was very helpful with explaining the development process and started quickly on the project.

Hieu Le

Executive Director of Product Development, Innovation Lab

The greatest benefit we got from Mindbowser is the expertise. Their team has developed apps in all different industries with all types of social proofs.

Alex Gobel

Co-Founder, Vesica

Mindbowser is professional, efficient and thorough.

MacKenzie Richter

Consultant, XPRIZE

Very committed, they create beautiful apps and are very benevolent. They have brilliant Ideas.

Laurie Mastrogiani

Founder, S.T.A.R.S of Wellness

Mindbowser was great; they listened to us a lot and helped us hone in on the actual idea of the app. They had put together fantastic wireframes for us.

Bennet Gillogly

Co-Founder, Flat Earth

Mindbowser was incredibly responsive and understood exactly what I needed. They matched me with the perfect team member who not only grasped my vision but executed it flawlessly. The entire experience felt collaborative, efficient, and truly aligned with my goals.

Katie Taylor

Founder, Child Life On Call

The team from Mindbowser stayed on task, asked the right questions, and completed the required tasks in a timely fashion! Strong work team!

Michael Wright

CEO, SDOH2Health LLC

Mindbowser was easy to work with and hit the ground running, immediately feeling like part of our team.

George Hodulik

CEO, Stealth Startup

Mindbowser was an excellent partner in developing my fitness app. They were patient, attentive, & understood my business needs. The end product exceeded my expectations. Thrilled to share it globally.

Jirina Harastova

Owner, Phalanx

Mindbowser's expertise in tech, process & mobile development made them our choice for our app. The team was dedicated to the process & delivered high-quality features on time. They also gave valuable industry advice. Highly recommend them for app development...

Marty Betz

Co-Founder, Fox&Fork