Have you ever wondered what an EHR solution is? An EHR solution is a digital filing software for patients’ medical histories, accessible by doctors, and promoting better care.
According to Grandview Market Research, the global electronic health records market is expected to be worth USD 29.06 billion in 2023, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.1% from 2024 to 2030.
When we talk about EHR (electronic health records), there are plenty of solutions like eClinicalWorks, Athenahealth, and Practice Fusion, but Cerner and Epic EMR are the big solutions—everyone knows their names.
They both offer the best cloud-based systems that help doctors communicate with patients, keep track of their care, and manage the financial side of things.
But with all the features they throw at you, it’s hard to tell which is better. If your healthcare practice is stuck between these two, don’t worry! Let’s navigate the complexities of Cerner vs. Epic to identify the optimal EHRs for your healthcare organization’s needs.
As we can see, both are EHR solutions and provide similar services, but we cannot call them alike because they have differences across domains. So, let’s get to know more about Epic and Cerner EHR.
Epic Systems Holding commands the largest market share for inpatient EHR, at around 38%. Epic typically serves large healthcare organizations, including major hospital systems and academic medical centers. It is engineered to manage extensive data and intricate workflows characteristic of big institutions.
Cerner EHR, which was acquired by Oracle in 2022, which has around 22% market share and was bought by Oracle in 2022, is more adaptable. It is suitable for major hospitals and smaller practices, making it a popular choice in various healthcare settings. Cerner provides solutions geared to address the operational demands of community hospitals as well as private clinics.
Interoperability is crucial for seamless communication between different healthcare systems. Epic EMR is renowned for its robust interoperability features, facilitating efficient data exchange across various platforms and systems.
Cerner EHR also excels in this domain, providing strong integration capabilities that allow healthcare providers to share and access patient information effortlessly.
Both EHR systems aim to improve care coordination and patient outcomes through enhanced data connectivity, though the extent and ease of integration may vary.
Ease of use and intuitive navigation are essential for healthcare professionals. Epic’s interface is designed with user experience in mind, offering a clean, organized layout that simplifies navigation for busy clinicians.
Cerner EHR also provides a user-friendly interface with customizable dashboards that allow users to tailor their experience according to their workflow preferences.
While both EHR systems focus on usability, the specific design and layout may appeal differently depending on user preferences and needs.
Reliable client support is critical for the smooth functioning of healthcare IT systems. Epic EMR is known for its comprehensive and responsive support services, ensuring users receive timely assistance and guidance.
Cerner EHR also offers strong support, helping clients maximize the benefits of their system. However, support experiences can vary, with some users reporting differences in responsiveness and effectiveness.
Both EHR solutions strive to provide robust support to maintain system performance and user satisfaction.
Cerner EHR provides continuous support through its eService portal, allowing users to log issues at any time. However, users have reported slower response times, leading to longer waits for issue resolution.
Epic EMR offers 24/7 support via a dedicated contact number, with technical experts addressing queries. The support team typically follows up within 24 hours of a query submission, providing timely assistance.
Related Case Study –Improved Predictive Accuracy in Childbirth with Advanced EHR Integration
Epic EMR stands out for its excellent interoperability, allowing seamless data exchange between various healthcare systems. Its user-friendly interface simplifies navigation for healthcare professionals, and the comprehensive support ensures timely assistance. Epic EMR offers extensive customization options, enabling healthcare facilities to tailor the system to their specific needs.
The main drawback of Epic EMR is its high cost, which can be a significant investment for many healthcare organizations. The implementation process is lengthy and complex, requiring substantial time and resources. Additionally, smaller practices might find Epic’s extensive features overwhelming and underutilized for their needs.
Cerner EHR is highly versatile, catering to both large hospitals and smaller practices. It offers strong data integration capabilities, facilitating seamless information sharing. The system’s customizable features allow healthcare providers to tailor workflows to their needs, enhancing efficiency. Additionally, Cerner’s adaptability makes it a suitable choice for various healthcare settings.
Cerner’s learning curve can be steep, requiring time and training for new users to become proficient. While Cerner EHR provides robust support, the quality of assistance can sometimes be inconsistent. Some users may also find the interface less intuitive than other EHR systems, potentially impacting the overall user experience.
Determining the exact pricing for Cerner EHR and Epic EMR can be challenging, as both companies do not publicly disclose detailed cost structures. However, available information provides some insights:
Epic, while more expensive, provides comprehensive features that might justify the higher cost for larger organizations. Evaluating the total cost of ownership, including implementation, maintenance, and support, is crucial to making an informed decision.
Epic’s subscription costs are significantly higher, ranging from $200 to $35,000 per month. The exact pricing depends on the size of the organization, the number of users, and the specific modules or features implemented. Additionally, Epic Systems provides a free trial for new users, so you can try first and then make the final decision.
Annual maintenance and support fees can also be significant, adding to the overall investment. Despite the high costs, many organizations find value in Epic EMR’s robust functionality and support, justifying the expense.
Cerner’s subscription costs start at approximately $25 per user per month. This base price can increase based on factors such as the size of the healthcare facility, the number of users, and additional features or services required. Although Cerner is cheaper, it does not provide a free trial version for new users.
Annual maintenance and support fees are also more moderate compared to Epic, making Cerner a cost-effective option for a wide range of healthcare facilities while still offering robust functionality.
To help you decide between Epic and Cerner EHR, consider these criterias:
Large hospital systems often favor Epic EMR due to its robust features, while Cerner’s versatility makes it suitable for both large and small practices. Assessing your facility’s size and specific needs will help determine which system aligns better with your operational requirements.
Epic and Cerner EHRs offer customization options, but Epic provides more extensive possibilities, allowing facilities to tailor the system to their unique workflows. Cerner also offers customizable features, which are beneficial for creating user-friendly interfaces and optimizing clinical processes.
Ensuring compliance with healthcare regulations is crucial. Both Epic and Cerner EHR are designed to meet regulatory standards, but it’s essential to evaluate how each system handles updates and maintains compliance to ensure your facility adheres to evolving healthcare laws and policies.
Epic EMR is known for its comprehensive support and maintenance services, providing timely assistance and ensuring smooth operations. Cerner EHR also offers strong support, but the quality can sometimes vary. Consistent, reliable support is vital for minimizing disruptions and maximizing system performance.
Epic EMR is designed with scalability in mind, making it well-suited for large healthcare organizations and those with long-term growth plans. Its architecture supports the addition of new functionalities and modules as needed, allowing the system to evolve alongside the organization’s expanding needs.
While Cerner offers a range of features suitable for various healthcare settings, its scalability may be more limited compared to some competitors. This could present challenges for organizations anticipating significant growth or requiring extensive system expansion over time.
Epic EMR’s implementation process is thorough but lengthy, often requiring significant time and resources. Cerner EHR offers flexibility in implementation, allowing healthcare providers to either manage the installation themselves or partner with third-party vendors for support. This adaptability can be advantageous for organizations seeking a more hands-on or customized approach to setup.
Both EHR systems offer patient engagement features, but Epic EMR is renowned for its comprehensive patient portal, which enhances communication and engagement. Cerner EHR also provides robust patient engagement tools, enabling effective patient interactions and improved overall care experiences.
Data security and privacy are paramount in healthcare. Both Epic and Cerner EHR implement stringent security measures to protect patient data. Evaluating each system’s security protocols and privacy practices ensures your facility can safeguard sensitive information and comply with data protection regulations.
▪️Target Audience: Cerner is well-suited for smaller practices or healthcare organizations with limited budgets and short-term goals. Its flexibility and affordability make it a practical choice for providers who require essential functionalities without the need for extensive customization or advanced features.
▪️Cost-Effectiveness: Given its more affordable subscription rates, Cerner is often preferred by smaller practices and clinics that need an efficient, budget-friendly EHR solution that can support their immediate operational needs without long-term financial commitment.
▪️Target Audience: Epic, on the other hand, is designed to meet the needs of larger hospitals and healthcare systems with long-term growth objectives. It provides a comprehensive suite of features that supports complex workflows, data management, and interoperability across departments.
▪️Growth and Scalability: Epic’s robust features make it an ideal choice for organizations looking to scale over time. As practices grow, Epic can easily accommodate new departments, patient volumes, and advanced data integration needs, positioning it as a solution that aligns with expansive, forward-looking healthcare goals.
Epic EMR and Cerner EHR are healthcare solutions that are compared based on specific needs and priorities. Epic’s robust features, seamless integration, and user-friendly interface make it an excellent choice for larger organizations, enhancing patient engagement and interoperability.
Cerner EHR’s flexible, comprehensive data analytics tools and innovative population health management approach provide healthcare providers with scalable solutions for improved patient outcomes and collaboration across diverse settings.
Mindbowser excels in EHR/EMR integration, offering tailored solutions to streamline your healthcare operations. With extensive experience across various EHR/EMR integration models like Epic and Cerner EHRs, the experts at Mindbowser ensure seamless implementation, regulatory compliance, and optimized performance.
Partnering with Mindbowser provides healthcare organizations with a multitude of benefits. Our expertise enhances data accuracy, a critical factor in delivering high-quality patient care. Accurate data reduces errors, supports better clinical decisions, and ensures patients receive the right treatments at the right times.
EPIC EMR, though often referred to as just EPIC, is actually a comprehensive Electronic Health Record (EHR) system. An EHR is like a digital version of a patient’s medical chart, but it can contain information from multiple providers, offering a more complete picture of a person’s health history. EMR, on the other hand, typically refers to a system limited to a single practice.
Choosing between Epic and Cerner depends on your healthcare facility’s size and specific needs. Epic is ideal for large hospital systems, while Cerner offers versatility for both large and smaller practices.
Cerner’s primary disadvantage is its steep learning curve, which can require significant training for new users. Additionally, the quality of support can sometimes be inconsistent.
EHR stands for Electronic Health Record. Its benefits include improved patient care, enhanced data accuracy, better coordination among healthcare providers, and increased efficiency in managing patient information.
The team at Mindbowser was highly professional, patient, and collaborative throughout our engagement. They struck the right balance between offering guidance and taking direction, which made the development process smooth. Although our project wasn’t related to healthcare, we clearly benefited...
Founder, Texas Ranch Security
Mindbowser played a crucial role in helping us bring everything together into a unified, cohesive product. Their commitment to industry-standard coding practices made an enormous difference, allowing developers to seamlessly transition in and out of the project without any confusion....
CEO, MarketsAI
I'm thrilled to be partnering with Mindbowser on our journey with TravelRite. The collaboration has been exceptional, and I’m truly grateful for the dedication and expertise the team has brought to the development process. Their commitment to our mission is...
Founder & CEO, TravelRite
The Mindbowser team's professionalism consistently impressed me. Their commitment to quality shone through in every aspect of the project. They truly went the extra mile, ensuring they understood our needs perfectly and were always willing to invest the time to...
CTO, New Day Therapeutics
I collaborated with Mindbowser for several years on a complex SaaS platform project. They took over a partially completed project and successfully transformed it into a fully functional and robust platform. Throughout the entire process, the quality of their work...
President, E.B. Carlson
Mindbowser and team are professional, talented and very responsive. They got us through a challenging situation with our IOT product successfully. They will be our go to dev team going forward.
Founder, Cascada
Amazing team to work with. Very responsive and very skilled in both front and backend engineering. Looking forward to our next project together.
Co-Founder, Emerge
The team is great to work with. Very professional, on task, and efficient.
Founder, PeriopMD
I can not express enough how pleased we are with the whole team. From the first call and meeting, they took our vision and ran with it. Communication was easy and everyone was flexible to our schedule. I’m excited to...
Founder, Seeke
We had very close go live timeline and Mindbowser team got us live a month before.
CEO, BuyNow WorldWide
If you want a team of great developers, I recommend them for the next project.
Founder, Teach Reach
Mindbowser built both iOS and Android apps for Mindworks, that have stood the test of time. 5 years later they still function quite beautifully. Their team always met their objectives and I'm very happy with the end result. Thank you!
Founder, Mindworks
Mindbowser has delivered a much better quality product than our previous tech vendors. Our product is stable and passed Well Architected Framework Review from AWS.
CEO, PurpleAnt
I am happy to share that we got USD 10k in cloud credits courtesy of our friends at Mindbowser. Thank you Pravin and Ayush, this means a lot to us.
CTO, Shortlist
Mindbowser is one of the reasons that our app is successful. These guys have been a great team.
Founder & CEO, MangoMirror
Kudos for all your hard work and diligence on the Telehealth platform project. You made it possible.
CEO, ThriveHealth
Mindbowser helped us build an awesome iOS app to bring balance to people’s lives.
CEO, SMILINGMIND
They were a very responsive team! Extremely easy to communicate and work with!
Founder & CEO, TotTech
We’ve had very little-to-no hiccups at all—it’s been a really pleasurable experience.
Co-Founder, TEAM8s
Mindbowser was very helpful with explaining the development process and started quickly on the project.
Executive Director of Product Development, Innovation Lab
The greatest benefit we got from Mindbowser is the expertise. Their team has developed apps in all different industries with all types of social proofs.
Co-Founder, Vesica
Mindbowser is professional, efficient and thorough.
Consultant, XPRIZE
Very committed, they create beautiful apps and are very benevolent. They have brilliant Ideas.
Founder, S.T.A.R.S of Wellness
Mindbowser was great; they listened to us a lot and helped us hone in on the actual idea of the app. They had put together fantastic wireframes for us.
Co-Founder, Flat Earth
Ayush was responsive and paired me with the best team member possible, to complete my complex vision and project. Could not be happier.
Founder, Child Life On Call
The team from Mindbowser stayed on task, asked the right questions, and completed the required tasks in a timely fashion! Strong work team!
CEO, SDOH2Health LLC
Mindbowser was easy to work with and hit the ground running, immediately feeling like part of our team.
CEO, Stealth Startup
Mindbowser was an excellent partner in developing my fitness app. They were patient, attentive, & understood my business needs. The end product exceeded my expectations. Thrilled to share it globally.
Owner, Phalanx
Mindbowser's expertise in tech, process & mobile development made them our choice for our app. The team was dedicated to the process & delivered high-quality features on time. They also gave valuable industry advice. Highly recommend them for app development...
Co-Founder, Fox&Fork