Automated Medical Questionnaire with Twilio and ChatGPT

Not all EHR systems are built the same, and if you’ve ever struggled with rigid, outdated platforms, you know the frustration. Headless EHRs are changing the game—offering customization, seamless integrations, and developer-friendly flexibility that traditional systems just can’t match. Instead of being locked into a one-size-fits-all approach, headless EHRs let you build a solution that fits your needs.

In this side-by-side comparison of Medplum, Healthie, and OpenEMR, we break down customization options, interoperability, scalability, security, and cost so that you can pick the best fit for your healthcare organization. If you’re looking for an EHR that works the way you need it to—this guide is for you.

Let’s learn more about headless EHRs first:

➡️ What are Headless EHRs?

A headless EHR is an electronic health record system where the user interface (front end) is separated from the data management system (back end). Unlike traditional EHRs, with predefined workflows and rigid UI, a headless EHR lets healthcare providers create a completely customized interface while keeping the important patient data structured and accessible. This approach is gaining popularity because it offers greater flexibility, better interoperability, and smoother integration with AI-driven healthcare applications, wearables, and third-party tools.

👉 Why should healthcare providers choose a headless EHR?

🔹 Customization: Build workflows that fit your exact needs rather than adjusting to outdated interfaces.
🔹Scalability: Adapts to evolving technology, seamlessly integrating with telehealth, AI analytics, and patient portals.
🔹 Interoperability: Ensures secure, real-time data sharing across healthcare applications, enhancing connectivity and patient care efficiency.

 ➡️ Overview of Medplum, Healthie, and OpenEMR

Choosing the right headless EHR can feel overwhelming, especially with many options promising flexibility, scalability, and seamless integrations. Whether you’re a healthcare startup, wellness platform, or full-scale medical practice, understanding how these EHRs function can help you make an informed decision.

Here’s a breakdown of Medplum, Healthie, and OpenEMR, explaining what makes each unique.

👉 Medplum: The Developer-Friendly, FHIR-Based Headless EHR

If you’re a developer or startup looking for maximum customization and interoperability, Medplum is built for you. As an open-source, FHIR-compliant headless EHR, it provides a flexible backend that allows you to build the frontend, integrate with existing tools, and scale effortlessly. Medplum is ideal for teams that need complete control over their data structure while ensuring compliance with FHIR standards for seamless healthcare integrations. It’s perfect for those who want an API-first, cloud-based solution without being locked into a rigid EHR system.

👉 Healthie: The Engagement-Focused EHR for Wellness & Virtual Care

Healthie takes a different approach, focusing on patient engagement, virtual care, and wellness platforms. Designed for nutritionists, therapists, and health coaches, it combines EHR functionality with scheduling, billing, and telehealth tools. Healthie offers an open API allowing developers to integrate engagement features like automated messaging, progress tracking, and virtual consultations into their workflows. If you’re building a wellness-focused digital health solution and want an intuitive, patient-friendly experience, Healthie is a strong contender.

👉 OpenEMR: The Comprehensive, All-in-One Open-Source EHR

For those looking for a full-fledged EHR and practice management system, OpenEMR is one of the most widely used open-source solutions. It offers medical records management, appointment scheduling, billing, and compliance tools, making it a better fit for clinics, hospitals, and healthcare organizations that need a ready-to-use platform with broad functionality. While OpenEMR is powerful and customizable, it may require technical expertise to implement and maintain, especially for teams looking for a fully tailored experience.

Related Read: Remote Patient Monitoring Billing Guidelines For Healthcare Providers – CPT Codes, Reimbursement & Compliance

➡️ Medplum vs. Healthie vs. OpenEMR: Which Headless EHR Fits Your Needs?

Different headless EHRs operate in several ways. Some offer complete customization, while others focus on pre-built features with fewer customization options. The key is finding the right balance between customization, interoperability, user experience, and support.

Let’s break down how Medplum, Healthie, and OpenEMR stack up across essential EHR features so you can make the right call.

1️⃣ Customization and Flexibility

🔹 Medplum

Medplum is built for developers and tech-driven healthcare teams that want full control over their EHR experience. With its FHIR-compliant API, teams can custom-build dashboards, patient portals, and workflows to match their needs. This is the go-to for organizations that don’t want to be stuck with rigid templates and pre-set workflows.

🔹 Healthie

Healthie provides some customization, but within its ecosystem. It has built-in telehealth, billing, and scheduling tools, which is good for teams that want an all-in-one EHR without heavy development work. The downside? If you need deep customization or integrations outside Healthie’s framework, you’ll hit limits quickly.

🔹 OpenEMR

OpenEMR offers extensive customization, but you’ll need technical expertise to make it work. Unlike Medplum, which is API-driven, OpenEMR requires manual modifications, self-hosting, and ongoing maintenance. If you have a development team and need open-source flexibility, this is a strong option—but be ready to handle the setup and upkeep yourself.

2️⃣  Scalability: Can the EHR Grow with Your Organization?

🔹 Medplum

Medplum is built to scale. Whether you’re a small telehealth startup or a growing hospital network, its FHIR-compliant API architecture ensures seamless expansion. You can add new features, integrate additional tools, and expand patient records without worrying about system overload. Since it’s cloud-based, you don’t need to manage hardware or manually scale servers—Medplum adapts as your organization grows.

🔹 Healthie

Healthie scales well for small to midsized practices, but it’s not designed for large enterprise-level expansion. If you’re running a small clinic or wellness practice, it works out of the box, but if your organization is expanding into multiple locations or needs deeper integrations, you’ll eventually hit a scalability wall. Since Healthie controls its infrastructure, you don’t have full control over how it scales.

🔹 OpenEMR

OpenEMR is as scalable as you make it. Since it’s self-hosted, you can expand storage, upgrade servers, and optimize databases to accommodate more patients and larger workflows. But scalability depends entirely on your technical team. If you have the right IT resources, OpenEMR can handle massive growth, but without proper maintenance, performance may degrade as your system expands.

➡️ Security and Compliance: Medplum vs. Healthie vs. OpenEMR

Security isn’t optional in healthcare—it’s mission-critical. Whether you’re handling patient medical records, billing information, or clinical workflows, data protection and regulatory compliance should be non-negotiable. A breach doesn’t just mean fines and penalties; it erodes trust and risks the patient’s safety.

Let’s break down how Medplum, Healthie, and OpenEMR compare when it comes to data security and compliance with industry regulations.

 1️⃣ Data Security Measures: How Well is Patient Data Protected?

 🔹 Medplum

Medplum takes security seriously, with enterprise-grade encryption, role-based access controls, and cloud-native security infrastructure. Since it’s built with FHIR-native architecture, it ensures secure data transmission, authentication, and storage right out of the box. Medplum also supports audit logs so healthcare organizations can track every action taken within the system, making it ideal for high-risk environments that need strict security policies.

 🔹 Healthie

Healthie implements standard security measures like encrypted data storage and two-factor authentication, making it a solid option for small to midsized practices. However, since it’s a closed system, users don’t have full control over security configurations. While it meets basic security requirements, organizations needing advanced security controls or third-party risk assessments might find limitations.

🔹 OpenEMR

OpenEMR’s security depends entirely on how it’s set up. Since it’s self-hosted, organizations can implement their encryption, firewalls, and access controls. While it offers some built-in security features, it can be vulnerable to cyber threats if improperly configured. Without an IT team managing regular security patches and updates, OpenEMR could pose serious risks in data protection.

Related Read: Securing Healthcare: The Critical Role of Data Security

2️⃣  Regulatory Compliance: Does It Meet HIPAA, GDPR, & Other Standards?

 🔹 Medplum

Medplum is fully HIPAA, GDPR, and FHIR-compliant, ensuring patient data is handled according to strict global standards. Because it’s built on modern security protocols, it supports automated compliance reporting, audit logs, and access monitoring, making it an excellent choice for healthcare organizations that require airtight compliance from day one.

🔹 Healthie

Healthie is HIPAA-compliant and provides secure data storage, but it doesn’t natively support FHIR. While it’s suitable for small and midsized practices needing a quick, compliant solution, larger organizations looking for deeper interoperability with strict compliance controls may find it limiting.

🔹 OpenEMR

OpenEMR can be HIPAA-compliant, but compliance depends on the user’s setup. Unlike Medplum and Healthie, which handle compliance as part of their infrastructure, OpenEMR requires manual security configurations, access control setup, and compliance monitoring. Without active IT management, OpenEMR cannot ensure full adherence to healthcare regulations.

Related Read: Navigating the Regulatory Landscape: A Guide to Healthcare Compliance Regulations

➡️ Cost & Implementation: Medplum vs. Healthie vs. OpenEMR

Choosing an EHR isn’t just about features—it’s also about cost and ease of implementation. Some platforms have subscription fees and built-in support, while others require self-hosting and ongoing maintenance costs. On top of that, how easy (or difficult) the setup process is can make or break an organization’s ability to switch or scale efficiently. Let’s break down Medplum, Healthie, and OpenEMR to see which fits your budget and implementation needs.

1️⃣  Cost Analysis: What’s the Total Expense?

 🔹 Medplum

Medplum follows a modern, API-first pricing model, which means you only pay for the resources you use. Since it’s cloud-based, there are no heavy infrastructure costs, and you don’t need a full IT team to manage it. It’s a great choice for startups and enterprises looking for predictable, scalable pricing without licensing fees or hidden maintenance costs.

🔹 Healthie

Healthie operates on a subscription-based pricing model, which means you pay a monthly or annual fee based on your organization’s size and needs. While it includes built-in telehealth, scheduling, and billing, the cost can increase significantly as you scale. It’s ideal for small to midsized practices that want a pre-packaged solution without worrying about backend infrastructure costs.

🔹 OpenEMR

OpenEMR is free and open-source, which sounds great—until you factor in the cost of implementation, hosting, and ongoing support. Since it’s self-hosted, you need server space, IT staff, and maintenance resources to keep it running efficiently. The price depends on whether you have in-house technical expertise or need to hire developers to configure, secure, and optimize the system.

2️⃣ Implementation Process: How Hard Is It to Set Up?

🔹 Medplum

Medplum is built for fast, API-driven implementation. Because it’s cloud-based, there’s no need to set up physical servers or worry about backend infrastructure. The FHIR-compliant API allows developers to integrate it seamlessly with existing tools, making it one of the quickest and most efficient EHRs to deploy. For teams with basic technical knowledge, implementation is smooth and scalable.

 🔹 Healthie

Healthie is plug-and-play, meaning setup is as easy as signing up and onboarding your team. There’s no need for deep technical knowledge, and you can start using the platform within days. The downside? If you need custom features or integrations outside Healthie’s ecosystem, you might run into limitations that require workarounds or support intervention.

🔹 OpenEMR

OpenEMR requires the most effort to implement. Since it’s self-hosted, organizations must set up their infrastructure, configure security protocols, and manage updates manually. If you have an IT team, it’s manageable—but for clinics or practices without technical expertise, setup can be complex, time-consuming, and prone to errors.

➡️ Pros and Cons: Medplum vs. Healthie vs. OpenEMR

No headless EHR is perfect—each comes with strengths and trade-offs depending on your organization needs. Some offer full customization, while others provide plug-and-play simplicity but with limited flexibility. Below is a detailed breakdown of the pros and cons of Medplum, Healthie, and OpenEMR, so you can make the right decision.

 1️⃣ Medplum: Full Control, but Still Growing

🔹 Pros:

Highly customizable – Built for developers and healthcare teams who want total UI, workflows, and data structure.
FHIR-native – Seamless interoperability and data exchange with third-party applications.
Transparent and open-source – No vendor lock-in, giving teams the freedom to modify, scale, and optimize.
Cloud-native and scalable – Handles large workloads without slowing down, making it great for fast-growing healthcare providers.

🔹 Cons:

Still maturing – Compared to legacy EHRs, Medplum is relatively new, meaning some features are still evolving.
Requires development expertise – This isn’t a plug-and-play solution—you’ll need technical skills to customize and set it up properly.

2️⃣ Healthie: Easy to Use, but Limited for Large-Scale Needs

🔹 Pros:

All-in-one solution – Comes with built-in telehealth, billing, and patient engagement tools, making it quick to deploy.
Robust API – Allows for some integrations, giving healthcare teams a way to connect with third-party applications.
Mobile-friendly – Strong mobile support for both patients and providers, improving accessibility.

🔹 Cons:

Not FHIR-native – While it offers API access, it’s not designed for deep interoperability with enterprise healthcare systems.
Limited customization – Great for small clinics, but lacks flexibility for large-scale enterprise integrations.
You’re locked into Healthie’s ecosystem – If you need features outside their platform, your options are limited.

3️⃣ OpenEMR: Feature- Rich, but Needs Technical Know-How

🔹 Pros:

Comprehensive feature set – Includes everything from patient records to billing and compliance, making it one of the most complete open-source EHRs.
Large community support – Backed by a strong open-source developer community, ensuring constant improvements and troubleshooting support.
Highly flexible – Since it’s self-hosted, it offers full control over how it’s configured and expanded.

🔹 Cons:

Outdated UI – Compared to modern EHRs, OpenEMR’s interface feels clunky and requires updates to make workflows intuitive.
Steep learning curve – Customization is possible but requires IT resources to implement and maintain effectively.
Not cloud-native – Since it’s self-hosted, scalability depends on how well the infrastructure is set up.