Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has evolved from a futuristic concept to a standard component of care delivery, particularly for managing chronic conditions, post-discharge follow-ups, and senior care. However, the real value of any remote patient monitoring platform lies not just in collecting vitals or health data. It’s in making that data visible and useful to care teams within their existing systems—most critically, their EHRs.
Yet, seamless integration between an RPM platform and an electronic health record (EHR) is far from being a plug-and-play solution. Healthcare tech leaders often run into fragmented data formats, inconsistent standards across EHR vendors, and compliance roadblocks that slow down or even stall implementation. A remote monitoring solution that isn’t fully integrated into clinical workflows often ends up underutilized, wasting both effort and investment.
In this blog, we’ll walk through the challenges that commonly arise when integrating a remote patient monitoring platform with an EHR system. More importantly, we’ll share actionable best practices based on what’s worked on the ground, including examples from our work at Mindbowser.
For any remote patient monitoring platform to deliver clinical impact, the data it collects must flow directly into the systems that care teams use every day. That means tight integration with the electronic health record (EHR)—not as an afterthought, but as part of the platform’s core design.
RPM data is only helpful if it’s available when it’s needed. Whether it’s a sudden spike in blood pressure or an abnormal blood glucose reading, clinicians need access to these insights in real time, not buried in a separate dashboard that requires toggling between systems. Integrated RPM enables quicker interventions and prevents minor issues from escalating into critical ones.
Without integration, care teams end up manually entering RPM data into the EHR—or worse, ignoring it altogether. This not only increases the risk of errors but also results in fragmented records that complicate care coordination. Integration ensures that everything from vitals to symptom reports lives in one place, improving reliability and reducing administrative burden.
When a patient moves between primary care, specialists, and post-acute care, an integrated system ensures that their monitoring history follows them. This continuity is essential for managing long-term conditions and improving the overall quality of care.
Many remote patient monitoring services are reimbursed through CPT codes that require the documentation of structured data. If your RPM platform is not properly integrated with the EHR, billing becomes a challenge. Integration supports clean documentation, which helps ensure providers get paid for the services they’re already delivering.
While the value of integration is clear, actually connecting a remote patient monitoring platform to an EHR presents numerous challenges. These aren’t just technical—they impact workflows, data reliability, compliance, and the overall success of your RPM program.
One of the first issues teams face is dealing with multiple healthcare data formats—HL7 v2, FHIR, CDA, CCD—all of which structure data differently. Even when two systems support “integration,” that doesn’t mean they speak the same language. Mapping one format to another takes time, especially when you’re handling device-generated vitals and symptom logs.
What works with one EHR often doesn’t work with another. Epic’s integration model, for instance, is different from Cerner’s. Each has its own developer portal, sandbox process, API behavior, and limitations. For RPM vendors, this means building multiple connectors or risking limiting your customer base.
Since RPM platforms handle real-time PHI, every touchpoint in the data flow—from the wearable device to the backend and the EHR—must comply with HIPAA. Add layers like third-party APIs, cloud infrastructure, or mobile apps, and you’re managing multiple points of vulnerability that all need to be secured.
Most RPM devices output raw data (e.g., heart rate, SpO2, blood glucose) that must be normalized, labeled, and placed into the appropriate EHR fields. That means building translation logic that understands both the medical context and the technical schema—something many platforms overlook early in their development.
Sometimes, integration is technically “done,” but the data ends up in the wrong place or in a format that care teams can’t use easily. If clinicians can’t act on the data, it doesn’t matter if it’s integrated. RPM must align with how physicians document, review, and make decisions inside the EHR.
Many EHR vendors restrict access to their APIs or limit developers to sandbox environments with outdated data. Without live testing, bugs often don’t appear until production, slowing down rollout and increasing support load post-launch.
Integrating your remote patient monitoring platform into an EHR isn’t a one-size-fits-all task. Every EHR vendor has its ecosystem, development tools, and quirks. Understanding how these systems differ—and where they align—can save you months of back-and-forth during implementation.
Epic’s developer environment, known as Open.epic, provides access to a set of FHIR-based APIs and some SMART on FHIR launch capabilities. It’s fairly mature, widely adopted in large hospital systems, and offers a clear workflow for sandbox access and production rollout.
However, integration approval can be slow, and custom workflows (like ingesting RPM device data directly into patient flowsheets) often require coordination with hospital IT. You’ll also need to map your platform’s output to Epic’s defined Observation resources to make the data visible in the right modules.
Cerner’s Ignite APIs also support FHIR, but the experience can vary depending on whether you’re dealing with traditional Cerner Millennium setups or newer Oracle transitions. Cerner systems are more fragmented across providers, which sometimes complicates testing and support.
Cerner enables device data ingestion, but the implementation relies heavily on standardizing payloads and collaborating closely with its developer network. You’ll often need to customize the integration flow per health system.
Outside of Epic and Cerner, many RPM solutions are compatible with mid-market EHRs, such as Allscripts or eClinicalWorks. While these platforms are often more flexible, their API coverage can be limited. In some cases, you may need to work with HL7 v2 interfaces or flat file transfers, which add complexity and latency to the process.
Regardless of vendor, most successful RPM-EHR integrations revolve around a handful of FHIR resources:
Using these resources consistently helps maintain interoperability across EHR systems, allowing clinical teams to find the data where they expect it.
We’ve worked with digital health companies that required real-time RPM data to be integrated into hospital EHRs without disrupting workflows. In several cases, we’ve helped configure device ingestion pipelines that conform to Epic and Cerner’s FHIR models, utilizing a modular approach that enables our clients to scale to multiple health systems without requiring rework of the core architecture.
Once you understand the landscape, the next step is building the right approach. Integrating your remote patient monitoring platform with EHRs is not just about connecting APIs—it’s about making sure the data flows in a way that supports real-world clinical use. Here are the best practices we’ve found that consistently lead to smoother rollouts and better outcomes.
If you’re building a frontend experience that launches within the EHR (such as a provider-facing dashboard), SMART on FHIR provides a standard method for authentication, authorization, and embedding. It also ensures your app inherits the EHR’s security policies and patient context, avoiding extra logins and lookup steps.
Related read: Building a SMART on FHIR App for Seamless EHR Integration for Remote Care
For RPM data—especially vital signs like heart rate, oxygen saturation, or weight—use well-defined FHIR resources, such as Observation, Device, and Patient. Avoid pushing custom payloads or free text, as this makes the data difficult to query, analyze, or bill against later.
Break your integration into logical stages:
This modular flow keeps your system resilient and easier to troubleshoot or upgrade.
Every PHI touchpoint—especially when third-party RPM devices are involved—needs proper audit logging and patient consent tracking. Build this into your system from day one. It’s not just about HIPAA compliance; it also builds trust with providers.
EHR vendors often provide sandbox environments for initial development. Use them, but don’t assume that sandbox success means production readiness. Always validate in staging environments with real workflows and simulated patient data.
Integration should never be done in a vacuum. Include nurses, physicians, and care coordinators when planning where and how RPM data should appear in the EHR. It’s the difference between building a tool that gets used and one that gets ignored.
Plan for gaps in internet connectivity, device sync failures, delayed readings, or mismatched patient IDs. These edge cases often surface only after launch, so simulate and document how your platform handles them in advance.
AutoConfirm AI is a workflow designed to streamline scheduling by syncing patient confirmations directly with EHR calendars. It reduces the need for manual coordination, helping front-desk teams stay focused while improving overall operational flow.
Let’s talk—identify gaps and see how we’ve solved them for others.
A notable example of successful EHR integration is a remote patient monitoring platform specifically designed for elderly care. The platform’s aim wasn’t just to collect vitals from Bluetooth-enabled medical devices but to ensure those insights were accessible and actionable for care teams, administrators, and compliance staff across various healthcare settings.
We developed an integrated system with three components:
Behind the scenes, the platform used FHIR-based APIs to make patient data EHR-ready. We mapped device readings to standardized observation resources and connected them with corresponding patient and encounter data to ensure every data point had clinical context.
We also implemented automated tracking of RPM usage patterns and device provisioning to support Medicare CPT codes. This allowed the client to generate documentation that could be ingested by billing modules in EHRs, saving administrative time and ensuring claims were audit-ready.
To take it a step further, we introduced RPMCheck AI, one of our voice-based solution accelerators built under the QConnect AI framework. It enables proactive patient check-ins using conversational AI, gathering updates on symptoms, medication adherence, or general well-being. The AI agent logs structured responses directly into the RPM platform and prepares summaries that can be pushed to the EHR.
By integrating both passive (device-generated) and active (patient-reported) data streams, the system provides providers with a more comprehensive picture of each patient’s condition, all within their existing workflow.
✅ The result? Over 90% patient engagement, reduced response time from care teams, and a platform that fits neatly into the day-to-day operations of skilled nursing and home health staff.
Once your remote patient monitoring platform is integrated with the EHR, the job isn’t done. The real test is how well that integration performs over time and whether it’s improving clinical outcomes and operational efficiency without adding more friction.
Here are the key areas we recommend monitoring:
How long does it take for a data point—say, a blood pressure reading—to appear in the EHR after a device captures it? A few seconds might be acceptable. A few hours isn’t. Delays can impact clinical decisions, especially for high-risk patients.
Make sure to track:
Even one mismatched patient ID or duplicated vital entry can create confusion—or worse, clinical errors. Build regular QA audits to validate that the data you push to the EHR:
Some of our clients have implemented periodic “shadow logging,” where data is logged both in the RPM dashboard and the EHR for comparison during initial rollout phases.
If the care team isn’t using the data, your integration isn’t delivering value, no matter how technically clean it is. Track:
It’s worth holding short check-ins with clinical teams in the early weeks post-deployment. Their feedback will indicate whether the data aligns with their workflow.
Having a visual layer that tracks the status of integration in real-time—data in, data errors, and data matched—can help your support team respond quickly. Dashboards with drill-down capabilities also help identify patterns like:
Finally, integration isn’t static. Clinical workflows evolve. RPM programs scale. APIs change. You need a process in place to gather regular feedback from users and stakeholders, prioritize improvements, and revalidate integration points on a rolling basis.
At Mindbowser, I help healthcare innovators streamline EHR integrations and scale faster with the right architecture from day one.
Want to assess your integration roadmap? Let’s talk—I’ll help you identify blind spots and fast-track your build.
Integrating a remote patient monitoring platform with your EHR isn’t just a technical task—it’s a strategic move that defines how useful your platform will be to care teams. When done right, it ensures that data flows in real time, gets documented properly, and supports clinical decisions instead of adding more work.
But as we’ve seen, there’s no shortage of hurdles. From dealing with fragmented data formats and tight EHR restrictions to aligning workflows and staying compliant, integration demands forethought and experience. The good news? These challenges are solvable, and you don’t have to reinvent the wheel.
At Mindbowser, we’ve helped digital health companies and provider organizations navigate the integration process end-to-end. Whether you’re working with Epic, Cerner, or a custom EHR, our team understands the nuances and builds with compliance and scale in mind.
Most issues stem from misaligned workflows, where the RPM data is technically integrated but ends up in a place within the EHR that clinicians don’t use or check regularly. Without clinical input during planning, integrations often fall short.
Timelines vary depending on the EHR vendor and level of integration. For Epic or Cerner, expect a phased rollout of anywhere from 6 to 12 weeks, including development, sandbox testing, production approval, and go-live support.
Yes—many cloud-based EHRs, such as eClinicalWorks, Athenahealth, or DrChrono, offer APIs and webhooks that support RPM data integration. Although the process may be simpler than that of large hospital systems, it still requires structured planning and testing.
FHIR is the preferred standard for modern integrations because it’s widely adopted and supports the structured exchange of health data. However, older systems might still rely on HL7 v2 or other formats. Your integration strategy should match the capabilities of the EHR you’re working with.
Join us for “Building AI & FHIR-First Clinical Platforms with Medplum”
Webinar Date: August 21, 2025 | Time: 1 PM EDT
We worked with Mindbowser on a design sprint, and their team did an awesome job. They really helped us shape the look and feel of our web app and gave us a clean, thoughtful design that our build team could...
The team at Mindbowser was highly professional, patient, and collaborative throughout our engagement. They struck the right balance between offering guidance and taking direction, which made the development process smooth. Although our project wasn’t related to healthcare, we clearly benefited...
Founder, Texas Ranch Security
Mindbowser played a crucial role in helping us bring everything together into a unified, cohesive product. Their commitment to industry-standard coding practices made an enormous difference, allowing developers to seamlessly transition in and out of the project without any confusion....
CEO, MarketsAI
I'm thrilled to be partnering with Mindbowser on our journey with TravelRite. The collaboration has been exceptional, and I’m truly grateful for the dedication and expertise the team has brought to the development process. Their commitment to our mission is...
Founder & CEO, TravelRite
The Mindbowser team's professionalism consistently impressed me. Their commitment to quality shone through in every aspect of the project. They truly went the extra mile, ensuring they understood our needs perfectly and were always willing to invest the time to...
CTO, New Day Therapeutics
I collaborated with Mindbowser for several years on a complex SaaS platform project. They took over a partially completed project and successfully transformed it into a fully functional and robust platform. Throughout the entire process, the quality of their work...
President, E.B. Carlson
Mindbowser and team are professional, talented and very responsive. They got us through a challenging situation with our IOT product successfully. They will be our go to dev team going forward.
Founder, Cascada
Amazing team to work with. Very responsive and very skilled in both front and backend engineering. Looking forward to our next project together.
Co-Founder, Emerge
The team is great to work with. Very professional, on task, and efficient.
Founder, PeriopMD
I can not express enough how pleased we are with the whole team. From the first call and meeting, they took our vision and ran with it. Communication was easy and everyone was flexible to our schedule. I’m excited to...
Founder, Seeke
We had very close go live timeline and Mindbowser team got us live a month before.
CEO, BuyNow WorldWide
Mindbowser brought in a team of skilled developers who were easy to work with and deeply committed to the project. If you're looking for reliable, high-quality development support, I’d absolutely recommend them.
Founder, Teach Reach
Mindbowser built both iOS and Android apps for Mindworks, that have stood the test of time. 5 years later they still function quite beautifully. Their team always met their objectives and I'm very happy with the end result. Thank you!
Founder, Mindworks
Mindbowser has delivered a much better quality product than our previous tech vendors. Our product is stable and passed Well Architected Framework Review from AWS.
CEO, PurpleAnt
I am happy to share that we got USD 10k in cloud credits courtesy of our friends at Mindbowser. Thank you Pravin and Ayush, this means a lot to us.
CTO, Shortlist
Mindbowser is one of the reasons that our app is successful. These guys have been a great team.
Founder & CEO, MangoMirror
Kudos for all your hard work and diligence on the Telehealth platform project. You made it possible.
CEO, ThriveHealth
Mindbowser helped us build an awesome iOS app to bring balance to people’s lives.
CEO, SMILINGMIND
They were a very responsive team! Extremely easy to communicate and work with!
Founder & CEO, TotTech
We’ve had very little-to-no hiccups at all—it’s been a really pleasurable experience.
Co-Founder, TEAM8s
Mindbowser was very helpful with explaining the development process and started quickly on the project.
Executive Director of Product Development, Innovation Lab
The greatest benefit we got from Mindbowser is the expertise. Their team has developed apps in all different industries with all types of social proofs.
Co-Founder, Vesica
Mindbowser is professional, efficient and thorough.
Consultant, XPRIZE
Very committed, they create beautiful apps and are very benevolent. They have brilliant Ideas.
Founder, S.T.A.R.S of Wellness
Mindbowser was great; they listened to us a lot and helped us hone in on the actual idea of the app. They had put together fantastic wireframes for us.
Co-Founder, Flat Earth
Mindbowser was incredibly responsive and understood exactly what I needed. They matched me with the perfect team member who not only grasped my vision but executed it flawlessly. The entire experience felt collaborative, efficient, and truly aligned with my goals.
Founder, Child Life On Call
The team from Mindbowser stayed on task, asked the right questions, and completed the required tasks in a timely fashion! Strong work team!
CEO, SDOH2Health LLC
Mindbowser was easy to work with and hit the ground running, immediately feeling like part of our team.
CEO, Stealth Startup
Mindbowser was an excellent partner in developing my fitness app. They were patient, attentive, & understood my business needs. The end product exceeded my expectations. Thrilled to share it globally.
Owner, Phalanx
Mindbowser's expertise in tech, process & mobile development made them our choice for our app. The team was dedicated to the process & delivered high-quality features on time. They also gave valuable industry advice. Highly recommend them for app development...
Co-Founder, Fox&Fork
