Data interoperability has always been an important issue in the healthcare ecosystem. Various healthcare providers and medical tech applications depend on data transformation across different systems and platforms. However, it is necessary to maintain seamless communication and exchange of patient information for an individual’s privacy and the organization’s security.
Unfortunately, the healthcare industry suffers from a lack of standardization. Fragmented data creates various challenges ,such as interoperability barriers between Electronic health records (EHRs), incompatible formats of data, and inefficiency in sharing patient data securely.
Volunteers created the HL7 committee in 1987 to address these problems among healthcare applications. The initial members followed by thousands of healthcare providers, vendors, and consultants dedicated their time to creating a strong foundation for the HL7 standards. Today, most of the clinical interfaces are built and deployed using these standards.
Since 1987, the variety of information has increased vastly due to advancements in the medical field. The complexity of healthcare data and the volume of data generated needed real-time access. The revolution of mobile device usage also demanded immediate access to data on request. In 201, HL7 began with a project that could meet these increasing demands. Thus the FHIR standard was created.
FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) was first considered as an interoperability standard, but as its use has grown and the community has grown, it has incorporated itself into other parts of the healthcare system. FHIR provided standards for building applications and flexibility for adapting them for specific purposes.
In this blog, we will provide detailed information regarding HL7 and FHIR and the differences between them. We aim to enable industry professionals to understand the healthcare interoperability standards better and offer them to understand how these data exchange standards enable comprehensive interoperability. Let us begin –
HL7, or Health Level Seven, refers to a globally recognized standard for exchanging clinical and administrative data between healthcare applications. Think of it as a common language that allows various healthcare systems, like EHRs and lab equipment, to communicate seamlessly. HL7 has played a critical role in promoting interoperability in healthcare data exchange.
While HL7 has been a successful standard, it also has limitations, such as complexities in representing certain clinical findings and limited ability to capture the sequence of patient episodes. However, HL7 continues to evolve, with newer versions addressing these limitations and promoting even better healthcare data exchange.
There are three main versions of HL7 –
Released in 1987, v2 is the most widely used version. HL7 v2 focuses on hospital workflows through electronic messages for administrative, logistical, financial, and clinical processes. HL7 v2 uses a specific format with segments and data elements separated by pipes, this is why it’s sometimes called “PipeHat”. Different versions exist (v2.1, v2.2, etc.), but they are mostly backward compatible, meaning a newer system can understand messages from an older system. The HL7 v2.3 and v2.3.1 are the most commonly used versions in practice.
Introduced later, v3 has a more complex structure based on a formal language called Resource Description Framework (RDF). HL7 v3 aims to be more semantic, meaning the data includes its meaning in addition to the value. While powerful, v3’s complexity has limited its adoption compared to v2.
FHIR, which stands for Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources, is a modern standard designed to streamline healthcare data exchange. It emerged as a response to the limitations of previous HL7 versions, particularly v2, in addressing the growing need for seamless information sharing within the healthcare ecosystem.
While HL7 started the journey for healthcare data sharing, FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) took it further, fixing the issues found in older HL7 versions and designed to be flexible for a cloud-based healthcare world. Here’s a look at the FHIR versions :
DSTU2 (Development Snapshot for Trial Use Release 2): Released in 2015, DSTU2 served as a foundation for FHIR’s development. It established core concepts like resources, data types, and APIs. While not widely used today, DSTU2 paved the way for more mature versions.
STU3 (Standard for Trial Use Release 3): Released in 2017, STU3 offered significant enhancements over DSTU2, with a wider range of resources and improved functionalities. While still used in some regions, R4 has become the dominant standard due to its increased maturity and feature set.
R4 (Release 4): Published in 2019, R4 represents the current gold standard for FHIR. It boasts a comprehensive set of resources encompassing various aspects of healthcare data, along with robust security features and improved interoperability. As of 2024, R4 enjoys widespread adoption in the healthcare industry.
Here’s what makes FHIR v3 a modern approach –
▪️Web-based technology: Unlike v2’s reliance on specific message formats, FHIR utilizes RESTful APIs and open web technologies. This allows quicker and more efficient data exchange, similar to how travel websites interact with airlines.
▪️Focus on interoperability: FHIR promotes seamless data exchange among healthcare information systems. This breaks down data silos and enables better care coordination between providers, payers, and patients.
▪️Simplified development: FHIR’s API approach makes it easier for developers to build applications that can access and share healthcare data. This reduces development time and effort compared to v2’s complex structure.
▪️Flexibility: FHIR offers a modular structure with resources, which are self-contained information units. This flexibility allows for easier customization and adaptation to specific healthcare data exchange needs.
▪️Patient-centric: FHIR recognizes the importance of patient engagement in healthcare. It supports patient data and empowers patients to share their information more easily.
FHIR represents a significant shift towards a more modern and efficient way to exchange healthcare data. It paves the way for improved care coordination, better patient outcomes, and a more connected healthcare system.
FHIR uses web services and resources for easier data exchange, making it faster and more flexible than previous HL7 versions. It aims to improve interoperability, simplify development, and empower patients in data sharing. Though not a complete replacement, FHIR offers a significant advancement for healthcare data exchange.
Related read: Decoding SMART on FHIR for Healthcare Interoperability
HL7’s text-based format with delimiters is hard to read and troubleshoot, while FHIR’s modern structure simplifies data interpretation and debugging for developers and healthcare providers.
HL7 lacks compatibility with today’s technologies due to limited web standard support. FHIR supports modern standards, ensuring easy integration with digital healthcare systems and improved interoperability.
HL7’s customized data sharing creates challenges, while FHIR uses standardized APIs for smooth and consistent data exchange, reducing errors and improving communication between healthcare systems.
HL7 needs extra tools for real-time alerts, whereas FHIR integrates triggers to fetch critical patient data in real-time, enabling faster decision-making in healthcare settings.
HL7 doesn’t support scoped access frameworks, but FHIR’s SMART on FHIR enables secure, permission-based access to patient data for personalized care solutions.
HL7 offers minimal API capabilities, limiting flexibility. FHIR excels with robust API support for data exchange, simplifying healthcare integrations, and enabling advanced app functionalities.
HL7 requires rigid, complex structures, making it tough to implement. FHIR simplifies processes with web services and flexible resources, speeding up healthcare application deployments.
HL7 achieves moderate interoperability but struggles with diverse systems. FHIR’s standardized resources allow seamless connections across various platforms, ensuring efficient data flow.
HL7’s reliance on point-to-point connections limits its adaptability to cloud systems, while FHIR’s web services are better suited for scalable and flexible cloud environments.
HL7 is tailored for specific messaging scenarios, which restricts adaptability. FHIR emphasizes reusable data resources, promoting flexibility and broader use in healthcare applications.
HL7 can scale within fixed systems but faces challenges with diverse environments. FHIR’s modular design supports growth across varied healthcare use cases and systems.
HL7 demands specialized expertise, making it less accessible. FHIR uses open web technologies, making it easier for developers to adopt and implement efficiently.
Both HL7 and FHIR emphasize TLS and strong authentication. FHIR adds flexibility to security features, complementing HL7’s mature and established security practices.
HL7’s widespread adoption reflects its reliability and maturity. FHIR is a modern alternative, rapidly gaining popularity due to its flexibility and compatibility with today’s technology.
At Mindbowser, we specialize in advanced custom healthcare software development, tailored to meet the unique needs of your healthcare organization. Our skilled healthcare software developers are dedicated to transforming your vision into reality, including migrating from HL7 to FHIR. We understand the importance of embracing modern standards like FHIR for improved interoperability and data exchange in the healthcare industry.
Our team has the expertise to integrate FHIR-compliant interfaces into your existing systems, ensuring smooth communication and efficient workflows. By leveraging our custom healthcare software development services, you can stay ahead of the curve and embrace the future of healthcare data exchange confidently. Migrating to FHIR is an investment in the future of healthcare data exchange. It paves the way for more efficient workflows, improved care coordination, and better patient outcomes. So, take the first step towards a more connected healthcare ecosystem – consider partnering with Mindbowser for your FHIR migration today!
HL7 primarily uses structured messages in XML format, while FHIR offers more flexibility with data resources available in both XML and JSON formats. FHIR also adopts web-based technologies like RESTful APIs, making it faster, more flexible, and easier to implement compared to HL7.
HL7 and FHIR are standards used in healthcare to facilitate the exchange of clinical and administrative data between different systems. They play a crucial role in ensuring interoperability among various healthcare applications, such as electronic health records (EHRs) and lab equipment, enabling seamless communication and data exchange.
Migrating from HL7 to FHIR offers several benefits, including improved interoperability, simplified development processes, better scalability, and suitability for cloud-based healthcare systems. FHIR’s modular design and focus on modern technologies make it an ideal choice for the evolving healthcare landscape.
The team at Mindbowser was highly professional, patient, and collaborative throughout our engagement. They struck the right balance between offering guidance and taking direction, which made the development process smooth. Although our project wasn’t related to healthcare, we clearly benefited...
Founder, Texas Ranch Security
Mindbowser played a crucial role in helping us bring everything together into a unified, cohesive product. Their commitment to industry-standard coding practices made an enormous difference, allowing developers to seamlessly transition in and out of the project without any confusion....
CEO, MarketsAI
I'm thrilled to be partnering with Mindbowser on our journey with TravelRite. The collaboration has been exceptional, and I’m truly grateful for the dedication and expertise the team has brought to the development process. Their commitment to our mission is...
Founder & CEO, TravelRite
The Mindbowser team's professionalism consistently impressed me. Their commitment to quality shone through in every aspect of the project. They truly went the extra mile, ensuring they understood our needs perfectly and were always willing to invest the time to...
CTO, New Day Therapeutics
I collaborated with Mindbowser for several years on a complex SaaS platform project. They took over a partially completed project and successfully transformed it into a fully functional and robust platform. Throughout the entire process, the quality of their work...
President, E.B. Carlson
Mindbowser and team are professional, talented and very responsive. They got us through a challenging situation with our IOT product successfully. They will be our go to dev team going forward.
Founder, Cascada
Amazing team to work with. Very responsive and very skilled in both front and backend engineering. Looking forward to our next project together.
Co-Founder, Emerge
The team is great to work with. Very professional, on task, and efficient.
Founder, PeriopMD
I can not express enough how pleased we are with the whole team. From the first call and meeting, they took our vision and ran with it. Communication was easy and everyone was flexible to our schedule. I’m excited to...
Founder, Seeke
We had very close go live timeline and Mindbowser team got us live a month before.
CEO, BuyNow WorldWide
If you want a team of great developers, I recommend them for the next project.
Founder, Teach Reach
Mindbowser built both iOS and Android apps for Mindworks, that have stood the test of time. 5 years later they still function quite beautifully. Their team always met their objectives and I'm very happy with the end result. Thank you!
Founder, Mindworks
Mindbowser has delivered a much better quality product than our previous tech vendors. Our product is stable and passed Well Architected Framework Review from AWS.
CEO, PurpleAnt
I am happy to share that we got USD 10k in cloud credits courtesy of our friends at Mindbowser. Thank you Pravin and Ayush, this means a lot to us.
CTO, Shortlist
Mindbowser is one of the reasons that our app is successful. These guys have been a great team.
Founder & CEO, MangoMirror
Kudos for all your hard work and diligence on the Telehealth platform project. You made it possible.
CEO, ThriveHealth
Mindbowser helped us build an awesome iOS app to bring balance to people’s lives.
CEO, SMILINGMIND
They were a very responsive team! Extremely easy to communicate and work with!
Founder & CEO, TotTech
We’ve had very little-to-no hiccups at all—it’s been a really pleasurable experience.
Co-Founder, TEAM8s
Mindbowser was very helpful with explaining the development process and started quickly on the project.
Executive Director of Product Development, Innovation Lab
The greatest benefit we got from Mindbowser is the expertise. Their team has developed apps in all different industries with all types of social proofs.
Co-Founder, Vesica
Mindbowser is professional, efficient and thorough.
Consultant, XPRIZE
Very committed, they create beautiful apps and are very benevolent. They have brilliant Ideas.
Founder, S.T.A.R.S of Wellness
Mindbowser was great; they listened to us a lot and helped us hone in on the actual idea of the app. They had put together fantastic wireframes for us.
Co-Founder, Flat Earth
Ayush was responsive and paired me with the best team member possible, to complete my complex vision and project. Could not be happier.
Founder, Child Life On Call
The team from Mindbowser stayed on task, asked the right questions, and completed the required tasks in a timely fashion! Strong work team!
CEO, SDOH2Health LLC
Mindbowser was easy to work with and hit the ground running, immediately feeling like part of our team.
CEO, Stealth Startup
Mindbowser was an excellent partner in developing my fitness app. They were patient, attentive, & understood my business needs. The end product exceeded my expectations. Thrilled to share it globally.
Owner, Phalanx
Mindbowser's expertise in tech, process & mobile development made them our choice for our app. The team was dedicated to the process & delivered high-quality features on time. They also gave valuable industry advice. Highly recommend them for app development...
Co-Founder, Fox&Fork